Own it
Assign one accountable owner
Name who collects the inputs, resolves missing information, records decisions and keeps the resource current after the first review.
CSV template / Free resource
Download a practical SEO audit checklist covering discovery, crawling, indexing, technical SEO, content, internal links, local search, measurement and prioritisation.
Download the SEO audit checklistNo email gate · Editable CSV · No tracking claims

Purpose
Use the checklist to organise evidence and ownership before turning crawler exports into recommendations. It is a review framework, not an automated score or ranking guarantee.
01Business and website context
02Crawling, indexation and canonical checks
03Technical and template review
04Keyword-to-page mapping
05Content and entity review
06Internal links and local SEO
07Measurement and conversion checks
08Impact, effort, owner and validation fields
Operating context
A planning file becomes useful when one owner maintains it, the inputs come from real evidence and the completed resource changes a priority, campaign, page or measurement decision.
Own it
Name who collects the inputs, resolves missing information, records decisions and keeps the resource current after the first review.
Evidence
Use platform exports, customer research, website evidence and approved business information. Mark estimates so they can be validated later.
Action
Translate the completed template into an owner, next action, success measure and review date. Documentation should create movement.
How to use it
Record the website, priority markets, key conversion, important templates, known changes and access available.
Add affected URLs, source evidence and an explanation rather than marking an issue from a tool score alone.
Estimate impact, confidence, effort, risk and dependencies before placing work in sequence.
Give each action an owner and define the check that proves implementation is complete.
Working guidance
Open each note when that decision becomes relevant. The complete guidance remains available without turning the page into a wall of copy.
A missing title, slow template or excluded URL is an observable condition. The commercial problem may be lost discovery, weak relevance or a blocked conversion journey. Record both so the recommendation explains why the issue matters instead of treating every crawler warning as equal.
Review representative service, category, product, article and location templates before listing hundreds of similar URLs. A template-level correction can resolve repeated markup, internal-link, rendering or metadata problems more safely than editing pages one at a time.
A technically clean page can still fail when it targets the wrong intent, lacks necessary proof or offers no useful next action. Include landing-page clarity, mobile usability, contact paths and qualified conversion definitions in the review.
Every recommendation should name affected pages, supporting evidence, expected effect, owner, dependency, validation method and rollback risk. Sequence prerequisites before cosmetic improvements and recheck production after the release.
Resource questions
No. It provides a repeatable structure, but interpretation depends on the business model, website platform, templates, search demand, competitors, migration history and access to reliable evidence.
Prioritise by likely impact, confidence, affected page value, implementation effort, dependency and risk. Indexation or template problems affecting important pages normally deserve attention before isolated cosmetic warnings.
Evidence may come from Search Console, analytics, tag management, page-speed diagnostics, server or platform information and a crawler. No single tool can determine business priority or prove the cause by itself.
Re-crawl or retest the affected template, inspect rendered output, confirm important URLs and analytics events, document the release and monitor the relevant search and conversion signals over an appropriate period.
Download and continue